Marlaloo Songline
Quick overview
The publicly shared Marlaloo Songline links story, named places, language, and cultural relationships in the Kimberley. It gives a specific example of how Country can be known through narrated journeys.
Read the full article ↓In depth
The Marlaloo Songline is a named public project along the Martuwarra, or Fitzroy River, in Western Australia. AIATSIS records elders' decision to map and maintain songs linking Balginjirr and Marlaloo. Its significance lies in Country, memory, and careful transmission; an online account gives context, not ownership of the songs or ceremonial knowledge.
A journey through Country
AIATSIS describes a songline crossing part of the Martuwarra landscape and joining people, places, and ancestral story. The route matters because it is specific. It is not a generic Australian songline drawn as a single line across a map, nor an abstract metaphor for every person's life path.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗
Named custodians
The public project names elders Rosie Mulligan and Madeline Yanamara, who were concerned that knowledge might disappear. They chose Edwin Mulligan and Mark Coles Smith to hold songs and ceremony for the future. Naming those decisions shows community agency rather than treating heritage as material collected by an institution.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗
Support and authority are different roles
The project also needed practical support. In the AIATSIS interview, Anne Poelina credits the Foundation’s seed investment with making the work possible. Funding enabled recording and mapping, while elders determined when sharing was appropriate and who should carry the songs forward. Those are different roles: an institution can provide resources without becoming the owner or source of the knowledge. Keeping both visible gives credit to the support and to the custodians who directed the work.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗
River, land, and sky
Poelina's public account speaks of connections among water, land, sky, and sites. Those relations are more than scenic description. They locate memory and responsibility in Country. A reader can understand the structure of connection without being given restricted verses or instructed to retrace a ceremonial path.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗ · First Law and the Martuwarra Fitzroy River · Anne Poelina ↗
Recording and continuity
AIATSIS supported recording, mapping, and maintenance after a long gap in performance. A recording may help later teaching, but it does not carry every relationship that gives a song its meaning. Transmission involves elders, chosen successors, permissions, and decisions about how a new generation will continue the work.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗
A public account with boundaries
The community-voiced AIATSIS account establishes the project's origin and named custodians. That account does not make songs or protected sites public property. Other Aboriginal songlines belong to their own custodians, and their content or permissions cannot be inferred from this example. The elders’ selection of successors in the AIATSIS account provides a concrete example of transmission governed by relationships and trust, not by recording technology alone.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗
A river is a living relationship
Nyikina Warrwa scholar Anne Poelina speaks publicly about the Martuwarra Fitzroy River as living Country and about obligations to know and care for place. Her account does not reveal the Marlaloo songs, but it gives a community-rooted frame for the river in which the named songline project sits. AIATSIS records that elders determined when mapping should proceed and who would carry material forward. These are decisions about authority, not merely archival logistics. The difference between a published project account and an available ceremony remains important: public explanation can teach the significance of relationships among water, land, and people without turning a route or song into open-access content. A recording may help a chosen successor, yet it cannot by itself replace their instruction or the river setting. Poelina’s broader account also links care for Country to present pressures on the river, reminding readers that transmission is affected by current land and water decisions.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗ · First Law and the Martuwarra Fitzroy River · Anne Poelina ↗
The decision to record followed decades of waiting
In the AIATSIS public interview, Nyikina Warrwa scholar Anne Poelina says discussion of mapping the songline had continued since 1976. Elders Rosie Mulligan and Madeline Yanamara were concerned that the song cycle, not performed for more than forty years, might disappear. They chose Edwin Mulligan and Mark Coles Smith as younger holders of the songs and ceremony. Those names and decisions matter more than the availability of recording equipment. The route through the Martuwarra landscape links places, water, and people, yet the public account also states that only appropriate custodians can speak for Country. AIATSIS later supported recording and mapping under that community leadership. A digital map can help chosen successors remember and teach; it does not create a right for every viewer to follow the route or retell what remains protected. The case shows transmission as an act of trust across generations, timed by elders' readiness. It also shows why land and water decisions in the present affect whether such relationships can continue.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗
Story as education, with distinct stories kept distinct
In an environmental education article, Nyikina Warrwa scholar Anne Poelina, Edwin Lee Mulligan, and their coauthors discuss a different Kimberley First Law story, Dangaba, as a way to learn about caring for Country and making decisions about extractive activity. They cite the Marlaloo film as a related example of elders using art, performance, and film to speak publicly. Dangaba and Marlaloo are not interchangeable narratives, and the paper does not disclose or interpret Marlaloo song verses. Its value here is its account of teaching: a story belongs to relationships among teller, listener, place, and present choices, rather than serving as a free-floating moral for strangers to collect. The authors argue for learning with local knowledge and scientific evidence when decisions affect Country. Their argument gives context for why a recording can support community education without replacing the elders who decide what to transmit, to whom, and when.
Sources for this section: The Marlaloo Songline · AIATSIS ↗ · Learning to care for Dangaba · Anne Poelina and coauthors ↗
Distilled highlights
Short ideas for orientation; the article and sources provide context.